Search
Go

Shop by category

 
Microsoft Windows XP Pro X64 Edition SP2B for System Builders [Old Version]
Email a friendView larger image

Microsoft Windows XP Pro X64 Edition SP2B for System Builders [Old Version]

This product is currently out of stock
Description:

This OEM software is intended for system builders only and cannot be transferred to another PC once it is installed. The purchaser of this software is required to comply with the terms of the System Builder license, including the responsibility of providing all end user support for the software.

Product Details:
Product Weight: 0.04 pounds
Package Length: 7.5 inches
Package Width: 5.3 inches
Package Height: 0.6 inches
Package Weight: 0.05 pounds
Average Customer Rating: based on 15 reviews
System Requirements:
Platform: Windows XP
Media: CD-ROM
Item Quantity: 1
Customer Reviews:
Average Customer Review: 3.5 ( 15 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.


Most Helpful Customer Reviews

20 of 21 found the following review helpful:

464-bit computing not for the faint of heart.May 22, 2007
By Christopher Wanko "-C"
I recently bought an AMD dual-core processor that uses a 64-bit architecture, and wanted to enjoy the full benefits of that. In addition to loading Linux, I also purchased a copy of Windows XP Professional 64, the 64-bit version of the OS.

First impressions are that I have a slightly different default desktop wallpaper, but nothing else seems radically divergent from the 32-bit UI. It sees the 2Gb correctly, as expected, and I'm curious to see what it'll show when the other stick of RAM are installed to bring it to 6Gb.

I haven't loaded most of the usual bloat, restricting this machine's use to games and some development tasks I'll bring from work. I might run Office, I might not, but I want to offer some words of advice to potential buyers.

One, good luck finding a 64-bit firewall. As of 22-May-2007, only Ghost Wall works under XP64. Zone Labs (now Checkpoint) has no plans to build one in the near future, Sunbelt's Kerio product is not slated for a 64-bit release either (choosing, like ZoneLabs, to focus on Vista), and Tiny Software (now CA) didn't have a 64-bit version either. So, you can use the stock firewall or Ghost Wall, or roll up your sleeves and build a Linksys router with firewalling capabilities.

Better news from antivirus vendors, though: Alwil's Avast product does work fine under XP64. Since I'm long-removed from running Norton or McAfee at home, I strongly suggest doing your homework before adopting XP64 if you have current licenses of those products. You might be out of luck. Avast is very good, so you aren't losing anything by switching.

The OS runs well, I don't have any crashing or lockups but I haven't really attempted to blue-screen it yet either. I really like the fast boot times and quick response, and while I might be running Linux a bit more on this box for non-gaming purposes, I still like having an MS OS available for helping out friends and family with their MS problems.

Worth buying? Yes, but only if you have a 64-bit CPU and you don't mind searching for native 64-bit apps and utilities.

-Fred

4 of 4 found the following review helpful:

4A must-have if you have over 3 gigs of RAM!Jan 10, 2008
By Winston Wolf
I recently bought a system that has 4 gigs of RAM and tried to run XP 32-bit on it, but Windows only "saw" 2.5 gigs. The BIOS saw the 4 gigs without a problem, so I did my research, and found that getting a 32 bit OS to recognize 3+ gigs is somewhere between a root canal (with no anesthetic) and self-amputation with a spork.
I had a license for XP64, so I installed it. It installed with no issue, and ran through the usual Windows update sessions with no problem at all. There are some driver issues, and if you're using a TV tuner card like I was in my old machine, save yourself the headache. It's not going to happen. I got my sound card running in no time (Audigy2 Platinum Pro),
Avast! Anti-virus installed with no issue, and my rig is up to 100%, showing 4 gigs of RAM, SLI running smooth, and overall a much better eXPerience (see what I did there????)
Do your homework, and realize that 64-bit computing is a newer technology, and will have a shakedown period before it's ready for prime-time, but overall, I'm very happy with my XP64 machine, and would recommend that others get it as well if you have the chip, RAM, and don't need Microsoft holding your hand after it's installed.

3 of 3 found the following review helpful:

4much stable than vistaMar 24, 2008
By Lynn Fyffe
Many of us are surprised by Microsoft who ditched their stable and fast XP 64. Instead, they pushed unstable vista on the market before it was done. For programming purpose, XP 64 is a much better choice. I've heard lots of studios in special effects industry kept their old Win32 to avoid all the hassles brought by Vista in their render farms.

3 of 3 found the following review helpful:

4From XP 32 to XP 64Feb 15, 2008
By Leih M. Klaire
I'm reviwing this product in comparison with Windows XP 32-bit, the operating system I've been using for years and still do at work. I reject Vista, which seems practically unusable for an advanced technical user.

One of the things that bugs me about the x64 version is that the 64-bit version of Explorer doesn't support 32-bit extensions - some of which I used frequently. I understand this is a technical limitation, so I'll just have to hope that someday the creators of the software I use frequently will eventually develop 64-bit extensions. There's a way to force use of the 32-bit Explorer by default, but in doing so, the Control Panel becomes pretty much inaccessible except from the Start menu, which is still running the 64-bit Explorer (since most Control Panel items are only available in the 64-bit Explorer).

I like to organize my "Program Files" folder. However, Windows XP x64 wants all 32-bit programs to go into the new "Program Files (x86)" folder, meaning I'll have some programs in the "Program Files" folder and some in the "Program Files (x86)" folder, which disrupts my organization. For most programs, it can work to change the default install folder to "Program Files", but in some cases, Windows (or the installer) overrides your decision and installs to the "Program Files (x86)" folder anyway.

There are other anomalies here and there that I can't easily figure-out and were never a problem with the 32-bit version, but these are usually small annoyances if any.

Otherwise, it's pretty much what you'd expect from XP. It's a pretty solid and usable Microsoft operating system. Easy to install.

1 of 1 found the following review helpful:

5it worksMar 23, 2011
By Jared A. Ross
Can't really 'review' this because it's Windows XP. It worked, the cd was new, what else is there to say?

See all 15 customer reviews on Amazon.com
About Us   Contact Us
Privacy Policy Copyright © , Home Business Store. All rights reserved.
Web business powered by Amazon WebStore
About Us Contact UsPrivacy Policy
Privacy Policy Copyright © Home Business Store. All rights reserved.
Web business powered by Amazon WebStore